Sunday, November 18, 2012

Flewen's reason of Charice issue



Flewens reaction regarding what I stated "Yes, we do clean our own dearest. But for some they took refuge in other faiths instead of trusting their leaders to help or guide them. Thats their decision. Its not that surprising. The INC leadership can only extend their hand but they cannot force a brethren to take it if they won’t. Charice and her Mother probably found comfort from famous personalities of your faith.]"

Flewen's response:
"because they know the truthfulness if you are in the Catholic Fold. The INC members who were boasting in the online world about their church were silence about Ms. Charice’s situation. Remember how her mother became a battered wife which is very saddenning and hilarious. This situation only shows that not all the time, that when a former non-INC becomes part of your fold, imperfections always exist in your church." 
Come again dear "because they know the truthfulness if you are in the Catholic Fold." don't be silly dear. What truthfulness are your implying? You cannot even find the term TRINITY in your BIBLE nor can you even find the very statement that you've so easily believe like "THREE PERSONS IN ONE GOD". Where can you FIND THAT in your BIBLE?

Thursday, November 15, 2012

Flewen Got it but Whose the LIAR?

Let us quote our dearest post in his reply to my post when I said "

In answer to what I said "Excuse me dear the INC are not fanatics." Flewen made this remark below

source: 


"I did not say that INCs are fanatics." - Flewen
Its quite clear what Flewen said he did not say that INCs are fanatics. My statement was based on what you said dear Flewen heres a copy of your post:


Really my dearest Flewen either your forgetful or just plain old silly LIAR.

Take note of what your post dearest said:
"I only showed up to you INC FANATICS that INC members are not perfect" - Flewen
See dearest it is not us whose  HYPOCRITE but you. On one end our dear Flewen says this and later DENIEs having said it.

Friday, November 4, 2011

Purgatory Is another Catholic Doctrine taken from Pagans

Have you really asked yourselves where
PURGATORY is being taught in the bible?
Or has Christ or the Apostles
ever taught this?

Catholics would normally take this post as an attack on their faith. But kindly consider the points being presented before you go in to that conclusion.  I was catholic before and its but natural for people to ask this without being accused of maligning the catholic faith.

So if ever you find things to be incorrect do share your points for us to consider so we can all benefit from this discussion.

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

Its a Cardinal Sin Who Accepts Money from SATAN

“If SATAN appears to ME and GIVES ME MONEY, I will ACCEPT the MONEY 
and spend it all on the poor. It is not the practice of the Church to ask
donors where the donations come from. Our duty is to make sure all
donations go to the poor,” said by Cardinal Sin got this here.
If thats really how Cardinal Sin felt. Then why didn’t he use the MONEY of the CHURCH which they OBVIOUSLY HAVE to spend on the poor?

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

21 Points to Settle Ryan's "Church Apostasy" or is it just APOSTASY

WHEN will this SAVAGE WOLVEs come? AFTER
THE APOSTLES had LEFT.

O ito dearest Ryan. Wag ka ng magpaikot ikot sa mga tanong mo. Lets finalize this dear:

1. Ryan dearest asked “Pleas clarify what you mean by "Church Apostasy".” Read my post dear there is no term as ARRANGED by your PREFERENCE in the BIBLE. Take note thats your PREFERRED ARRANGEMENT not ours.

2. What I am discussing is ECHOED simply in what is WRITTEN. An APOSTASY that will happen to the CHURCH as RELAYED by the APOSTLEs when they LEAVE. 

3. What will AFFECT the CHURCH when the apostle leave? the APOSTASY that simple.

The Catholic Church in the beginning is the Church of Christ

Mahina ba ang GANID NA LOBO?

Ryans misguided thinking "Ayusin muna ninyo itong hindi ninyo pagkakaintendihan so we can get back to your business, Jo King."

Matagal lang pong ayus dearrest. Ang ayusin mo dearest ay yun UNAWA ninyo. Mantakin mo naman dear ang LAYO ng UNAWA MO dun sa SINABI ni Cath.

And I though you harbor good reasoning but its faltering to the HILARIOUS side of being SILLY. No dear, I am not talking about CHILI. 

Thursday, September 29, 2011

Answering Ryan - SUCCESSORs of the Apostles





Beware of Wolves in Sheep's Clothing. Men who
DISTORTs the TRUTH. Notice how they act when
it comes to the TRUTH written in the scriptrues.
They question theTRUTH written in the bible
and INJECT their own INTERPRETATIONS

Hi again dearest Ryan, seems your still avoiding answering the simple question dearest. 


This discussion seems to be one sided. Ok dearest I'll answer some of your questions again. You asked "So, you are saying that when we read the word "apostasy" in the Bible, it means Apostasy OF the Church or the Apostasy OF the ENTIRE Church. Do you confirm this?"

Don't dwell to much on what I say dearest. But on what the bible or your bible attest. Let me state again on "Apostasy OF the Church"...
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...